Gary Gibson, Geneva, Florida…
Slow news day, huh?
We are kidding, of course, good patrons. There’s been some pretty big news.
The S&P was forced to admit what we fringe pundits and kibitzers
have been saying for years: U.S. debt is not quite as sound as the
official ratings agencies would like you to believe.
The S&P 500, Dow and Nasdaq all took the official admission
pretty hard. The S&P and Nasdaq are down 5%, the Dow nearly 4%.
Gold meanwhile is all smiles and back-slapping. We pulled up the
charts this morning and due to our ingrained bias we immediately looked
at silver. Nothing much going on there…
We usually don’t even bother looking at the gold price. Silver is
where the big moves usually happen. Whatsoever gold does, silver often
does twice as much…
And silver is what we’re counting on to increase our purchasing power as gold does little better than protect it…
But it was gold that made the big boy moves today! Up over $1700. We
check our records. And our pulse. As near as we can tell this is a
first.
As we put the finishing touches on today’s little ditty gold is at an
all-time high of $1718. Gold is almost as expensive as platinum right
now.
Silver meanwhile is feeling lethargic. It can’t seem to be bothered
to get out of bed even as gold is circling the block a second time on
its morning run. Silver remains just below $40 again today, and only a
dollar above its Friday close around $38.
Gold’s Friday close was about $1650. That’s a 4.2% gain against the Dow’s 3.8% loss (again, as of this writing)…
None of this should come as any surprise, however. Things are happening as they ought.
Adjusted for inflation, gold is still nowhere near its 1980 high of a nominal $850, or about $2400 in today’s dollars.
Securities meanwhile are inflated in value, pumped up for at least a
generation by the actions of the central bank. These actions have been
eroding the value of the dollar, long cut free from its golden moorings.
Gold’s price has failed to reflect this reality for longer than you’d
think was possible.
But now stocks can’t keep up despite the dollar’s sacrifice. The dollar’s decay, however, lends gold renewed strength.
The Dow and gold are seeking each other out, planning a rendezvous at
price parity somewhere. Their meeting point might have been 3000 before
the Fed opened the spigot. It point may be 5000 as things stand right
now. It could be 10,000 or more if the Fed keeps easing.
Of course at that point, anyone holding U.S. dollar or U.S. debt or
corporate shares won’t be happy. The reason for the dollar and debt may
be obvious, but what about the stock markket? Robert P. Murphy explain
answers the question below…
Whiskey & Gunpowder
by Robert P. Murphy
August 8, 2011
Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
by Robert P. Murphy
August 8, 2011
Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Why Is The Stock Market Plunging?
Investors the world over are still reeling from last Thursday’s
massive plunge in the US equity markets, in which the major indices all
gave up more than 4 percent. It was the worst day for the US stock
market since December 2008. [And today's markets are down over 4%
again.--Ed.]
None of this should surprise those conversant with Austrian
economics. The “fundamentals” of the economy have been and remain awful
because the government and Federal Reserve are consistently doing the
wrong things. The apparent recovery, fueled by Bernanke’s sheer money
creation, has been bogus all along.
Bubble, Bubble, Bubble
For some reason, people still cling to the vague hope that — at least
if we wait long enough — the market always goes up, and “buy and hold”
is a great strategy. Let’s look at a long-term chart of the S&P 500:
Does the above chart really look like the US stock market is in store for smooth sailing? Just about everyone except Chicago School economists now recognizes, after the fact, that the United States obviously went through a tech and dot-com bubble in the late 1990s and then a housing bubble a few years later. Is it really so difficult to understand that trillions in government budget deficits over the past few years, coupled with unprecedented inflation by the central bank, have set the economy up for yet another crash?
Alan Greenspan’s low-interest-rate policy in the wake of the dot-com
crash spawned the housing bubble. Greenspan’s Fed didn’t actually
eliminate the need for a recession, but instead postponed the crisis and
made it fester. When reality hit in September 2008, Ben Bernanke was in
charge of the Fed and implemented his predecessor’s failed approach
times ten.
No matter how many pundits and famous economists declare otherwise,
Bernanke did not save the day with his interventions. He has simply
postponed the day of reckoning yet again, and we can expect the final
crisis to be much worse than the mere collapse of a few major investment
banks. (The short documentary Overdose makes the case in a chilling
fashion.)
Ben Bernanke Engineered the “Recovery,” All Right
In a perverse way, the pundits are correct in crediting Ben
Bernanke’s extraordinary programs for “rescuing” the stock market. If we
zoom in on the chart of the S&P 500 and superimpose the monetary
base, we can see how closely the two have moved since the crisis began.
Although the above chart shows a decent fit, in reality the stock market responded very quickly to changes in the expectations of Fed expansion. Specifically, the sharp upswing in the S&P 500 in March 2009 coincided with the announcement of the Fed’s full strategy for (what we now call) QE1, and the market rally in the late summer of 2010 began as knowledgeable Fed officials made it clearer and clearer that QE2 would kick in after the fall elections.
Of course, those economists who believe Bernanke is engaging in a
tight-money policy would point to the above as evidence in their favor —
the Fed just needs to print more, because it’s worked twice already!
But if one believes that showering trillions of newly created dollars
into the financial sector (with the specific aim of bailing out the very
parties who made reckless loans and investments during the housing
bubble) is notconducive to a healthy recovery, then the booming stock
market of the last few years should have been an ominous sign. Note that
this isn’t 20/20 hindsight; other Austrians and I have been warning
that this “recovery” has been bogus all along, and that the stock market
could collapse at any time.
Inflation Lifts All Boats
None of the above analysis implies that investors should dump all
equities immediately. It is true that the prospects for real economic
growth are terrible — especially in the Western countries — over the
next decade, because of increased regulations and swollen government
debt loads. But at the same time, various central banks, especially the
Federal Reserve, have been all too willing to create new money as an
apparent solution to every crisis. (A case in point was the absurd
proposal for the Treasury to issue two trillion-dollar platinum coins to
evade the statutory debt ceiling.)
In this environment, someone relying on fixed-income investments
(such as private annuities or, heaven forbid, government retirement
checks) could be wiped out by massive price inflation. As awful as the
US real-estate and stock markets might be in the short and medium run,
holding a portion of one’s wealth in assets not denominated in fiat
currency may turn out to be a very wise defensive move. (The problem
with shooting the moon on precious metals is that for all we know the
dollar will crash next year and Obama will make it illegal to buy and
sell gold.)
Conclusion
The US economy still needs to recover from the festering malinvestments that accumulated during the previous two booms.
By pushing interest rates down to zero and bailing out the very people
who made such bad financial decisions in the first place, the Fed and
Treasury are doing everything they can to exacerbate the problem.
In this volatile world economy, investors can expect continued
volatility in the stock market. The only thing we can really be sure of
is that the government will use each new crisis to justify further
extensions of its power. At some point the feds will probably seize the
highly volatile 401(k)s and other stock-market holdings from citizens
and replace them with “safe” government annuities.
Knowledge of Austrian economics doesn’t render someone an expert
investor, but it certainly gives advance warning of the major trends in
the economy. Those investors who rely on the Keynesians featured at CNBC
think that another stimulus package or QE3 might do the trick.
Regards,
Robert P. Murphy
Robert Murphy is an adjunct scholar of the Mises Institute, where he teaches at the Mises Academy. He runs the blog Free Advice and is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism, the Study Guide to “Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market,” the “Human Action” Study Guide, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal, and his newest book, Lessons for the Young Economist.
Markets can behave in very strange ways.
ReplyDelete