The silver market is several orders of magnitude too small for the U.S.        government to even be concerned about.  It is impossible that the        U.S. government could confiscate enough silver bullion to even make even        the tiniest difference to the annual budget!  
The total silver bullion available in the entire world is down to about        60 to 600 million ounces.  At $20/oz., that's worth $1.2 billion to        $12 billion, yet U.S. annual government budgets are around $3000 billion,        and the deficit alone is about $1000 billion. How could $1.2 billion        dollars even help in the slightest to help fund a budget deficit of 1000        billion, nearly 1000 times as large?
Thus, there is no need to be remotely concerned about confiscation        until well after silver bullion rises in price by at least a factor of        1000!  And even then, the silver in the U.S., about 100 million        ounces, at the COMEX, would be worth $20,000/oz., for a total of a mere $2        trillion, which is, again, a mere drop in the bucket when considering the        dollar amount of government expenditures, which are over $3 trillion, and        the U.S. debt is $9 trillion, with unfunded liabilities of $75        trillion!  
Furthermore, let's look at the gold confiscation of 1933.  In        actual fact, the vast majority of people never turned in their gold.         The government increased their own gold hoard by only 1% through        confiscation, so you are not likely to lose your silver if the government        even tried to confiscate.
Furthermore, of all the assets available, gold and silver are the        absolute hardest to actually confiscate, because they are easily hidden,        portable, off the books, and are essentially untraceable.  That's why        they are money, because of such intrinsic properties.  
In contrast, Real Estate is much easier to tax.  There is no such        annual "property tax" on silver or gold.
In fact, you may need physical gold or silver to be able to hold on to        real estate in the future.  If paper money collapses, they will        surely levy a tax of gold or silver on all real estate.
So, although it is always possible that the government might confiscate        silver in the future, I think the possibility is rather remote.  
The typical result in history when governments try to confiscate gold        and silver is that the governments quickly collapse.  It is an        anomaly of history that the U.S. government did not collapse in 1933, but        perhaps the reason it survived is that paper money could be redeemed for        gold by foreigners until 1971, and perhaps because gold trading was        legalized again in 1975.
But more importantly, let's focus on the present.  They are not        confiscating silver now.
Today's government confiscation takes place through inflation!         Currently, money creation rates are at about 20%, so inflation is 20%, and        thus, the dollar will lose 20% of its value in a year.  In the last 4        years, the dollar has lost over 75% of its value (as measured by silver        and gold, since gold and silver prices have nearly quadrupled), and the        dollar is on pace to lose another 20% in the next 12 months!
Another government confiscation is through income taxes.  There        were no income taxes in the U.S. when silver and gold were money, prior to        1913 when the Federal Reserve was founded.
Confiscation fears are understandable. Although silver that you own is        default free, and cannot go to zero value.  But there is only one        remaining problem: it can be stolen by thieves, or government. This is the        age-old problem of being wealthy, you have to protect your wealth.
Let me emphasize, you have to protect your wealth, you, not somebody        else.  Like many activities, we often try to hire out jobs we don't        like.  We hire people in government to be the police, to fight fires,        and to build roads.  In the private sector, most of us hire other        people to build our houses or cars for us, as the vast majority of people        work in other jobs. 
But it can be dangerous if you hire other people to protect your wealth for you. Every such hired person has a great temptation when placed in that position.
But it can be dangerous if you hire other people to protect your wealth for you. Every such hired person has a great temptation when placed in that position.
Let's put it this way.  You don't ask another man to hold your        wallet, and you don't ask another man to hold your wife.  Some things        are your responsibility only.  
You can hire a personal trainer, but you cannot hire another person to        exercise for you, either.
You can hire a driver, but you can't hire someone else to take your        test to get your driver's license.
Some things you just have to do yourself, and guarding your wealth is        one of them.
Guarding your own wealth serves several positive functions and purposes        for society and you.  First, it distributes wealth among the people,        rather than allowing it to be concentrated, and more easily stolen by        thieves or government entities.  Second, it forces you to take more        responsibility for your direct surroundings, such as where you live, which        directly contributes to helping make the world a safer and better        place.  Third, you will be more likely to take precautions for        overall home defense and personal security, such as getting a burglar        alarm system or firearms.  Fourth, you are more likely to want to        keep yourself physically fit and ready for personal self defence, which is        good for your health.  Fifth, a people that owns firearms is more        likely to be free and more immune to invasion by any enemies.
So, if there ever was any sort of government confiscation order, who        would mostly likely be harmed?  Primarily those entities who would be        affected would be the investors who held silver or gold with the exchange        traded funds (ETF's) such as Barclays SLV, or e-bullion trading systems,        or the COMEX, or any sort of silver or gold held for you by any major        broker or bank.  
In fact, if there is any silver or gold confiscation order, it would        likely be to help the banks, to eliminate the silver and gold liabilities        of the major banks and brokerage houses, so that they can give you paper,        instead of silver or gold, in case the prices of the precious metals begin        to take off.
Some people say that places like goldmoney.com which is incorporated        overseas and uses vaults in Europe, is immune from U.S. government        confiscation.  Others say that Australia's Perth Mint certificates        are also likewise immune.
But the lesson of the Argentina currency crisis in 2001 should be        remembered.  U.S. Citizens who put U.S. dollars in U.S. banks in        Argentina had their dollars converted to Argentine pesos against their        will, and lost 75% of the value of their accounts nearly overnight as the        Argentine peso collapsed by about that amount.  U.S. Banks said they        had no choice but to obey the orders of the government of Argentina, which        was, of course, very convenient for them!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_economic_crisis_(1999-2002)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_economic_crisis_(1999-2002)
So, being located in another nation does not always offer        protection.
Freedom requires responsibility.  
Banks offer a false kind of security.
Those who would give up responsibility for security deserve neither one        and will end up enslaved.
Those who mock silver and gold love to tout stories of people who had        their silver or gold stolen by common thieves.
At most, I could hardly conceive that 1% or less, of the people's        physical wealth could be stolen, physically, in a year!  
Yet what is inflation?  Inflation of 20% steals 20% of all of        society's paper wealth in a year!
The irony is that paper money's "reason for existence" is that it's        supposed to protect us from the theft of physical bullion, but paper money        is no protection at all!  Paper money is evidence that you and your        ancestors abandoned your silver and gold to the institutionalized thieves        long ago.
Could you imagine the societal uproar that would happen if 100% of the        assets of 1 person in 5 were totally stolen each year by thieves?         And yet, that is the societal equivalent of a 20% inflation, or currency        devaluation!
If you are going to fear confiscation, then fear inflation, for that is        the real confiscation.
In fact, fear paper money, for paper money was created to deceive the        holders of the physical gold and silver in the first place.  And        also, fear the entire concept of banks, for banks are also a mechanism of        confiscation!  Fear also, insurance, social security, annuities,        inflation-indexed bonds, futures contracts, and options.  All are        merely "promises to pay", and are all paper instruments designed to        confiscate your real gold and silver.
The only solution to the problem of confiscation is getting real silver        and gold.
Some scammers will try to convince you that "numismatic" items are        immune from confiscation.  Whatever!  I think numismatics are        just another form of confiscation themselves; they are expensive idols,        special images on coins that supposedly have higher value, but the value        is to the seller of the items, as they usually have a very large spread,        and you get much less back when you try to sell them.  Even if you        get "cheap" numismatic coins for only 15% over spot, I reason, why pay 15%        more for "special" bullion, when you can pay 5% just to protect the real        stuff?  
I know a guy who spent $150,000 on "walking liberties" at 75% over        spot!  He only got the spot price when he sold them!  Most        people who try to spend $100,000 in the rare coin market, ARE the rare        coin market.  Beware!
I recommend that you store your wealth in a safe, in your home.         Bolt the safe down, from the inside, into concrete or wall studs.         Get a safe that is an appropriate size for your wealth.  Buy a $50        lock box, or a $500 floor safe, or a $5000 vault safe if you have        to.  A good rule of thumb is to spend about 1-5% of your wealth on        personal security.
If you have wealth, you can afford to guard it, or you can afford to        move to a safer neighborhood, it's that simple.  Don't neglect that        crucial responsibility.
Don't try to insure it, I think insurance is a scam, and I don't even        know if you can insure bullion stored at home.  One way to insure        your wealth is to spread it around.  Do you have family?  Buy        them a few safes, and store wealth with them.   
Finally, some people have asked me, "What if a crook comes to your        house with a gun, and forces you to open your safe?"  What if, what        if!  It's never happened yet.  Common thieves don't read        investment newsletters, they are out for the easy score.  Most silver        and gold thieves disguise themselves as "respectable" businesses who want        to hold your silver and gold for you! 
  
Besides, that's why I have gates, guards, dogs, security alarms, safes, and firearms, and I've diversified. But the reality is that I know my life is a temporary thing. I'll be gone in about 40-50 years if I'm blessed to live so long, and my silver will be there for my children or my children's children. But more importantly is how I live my short life; shall I live it in fear, or shall I take responsibility?
Besides, that's why I have gates, guards, dogs, security alarms, safes, and firearms, and I've diversified. But the reality is that I know my life is a temporary thing. I'll be gone in about 40-50 years if I'm blessed to live so long, and my silver will be there for my children or my children's children. But more importantly is how I live my short life; shall I live it in fear, or shall I take responsibility?
Sincerely,
 

 
No comments:
Post a Comment