- Jus Sanguinis creates unwitting IRS targets
- Just another creepy twitch from a dying empire
- Looking for liberty in international waters
Gary Gibson, Minneapolis, Minnesota...
Nowhere to run or hide.
This past weekend, we sent you the following ruminations...
"Sure America is already a bankrupt, overreaching empire and becoming a police state with bankrupt and failing municipalities...but it's home.
"And honestly, are things really that much better anyplace else? It's not like you can escape the U.S. and find yourself in some utopia of liberty and sound money. Every scrap of real estate on this planet is claimed by one dysfunctional nation-state or another, all using toilet paper for money, all with some ridiculous rules governing personal conduct and all claiming a portion of their subjects' labor in exchange for various levels of public 'services,' which are inherently lower quality and more expensive than what the market would produce."
And we received the following response from one of our regulars at the bar:
"Exactly! You got it right, brah!
"I''m glad for all the wealthy geebs who love living [wherever else]. And who have the money to do a global hopscotch as the 'economic Whack-A-Mole' effect shows up in their temporary home environments.
"But true personal risk management hinges on many factors and is highly individualized. If you can manage to move to another [seemingly more secure or free] country but can't bug out at the drop of a hat because of some black swan event, you're just as screwed as you would be by staying here.
"Lee_K"
And it seems that the U.S. is just going to go after you no matter what you do or where you go.
In today's feature article, Wendy McElroy reminds us that the U.S.
considers its citizens to be tax cows no matter where they are...and the
rest of the world better help with the milking.
And in today's Parting Shot we look at an unusual future alternative
to traditional expatriation...and some ways to avoid becoming a target
for a desperate, crumbling empire...
Whiskey & Gunpowder
by Wendy McElroy
by Wendy McElroy
When Julie Veilleux discovered she was American, she went to the
nearest U.S. embassy to renounce her citizenship. Having lived in Canada
since she was a young child, the 48-year-old had no idea she carried
the burden of dual citizenship. But the renunciation will not clear away
the past 10 years of penalties with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Born to American parents living in Canada, Kerry Knoll's two teenaged
daughters had no clue they became dual citizens at birth. (An American
parent confers such status on Canadian-born children.) Now the IRS wants
to grab at money they earned in Canada from summer jobs; the girls had
hoped to use their RESPs (registered education savings plans) for
college.
The IRS is making a worldwide push to squeeze money from Americans
living abroad and from anyone who holds dual citizenship, whether they
know it or not. It doesn't matter if the "duals" want U.S.
status, have never set foot on U.S. soil or never conducted business
with an American. It doesn't matter if those targeted owe a single cent
to the IRS. Unlike almost every other nation in the world, the United
States requires citizens living abroad to file tax forms on the money
they do not owe as well as to report foreign bank accounts or holdings
such as stocks or RSSPs. The possible penalty for not reporting is
$10,000 per "disclosed asset" per year.
Thus, Americans and dual citizens living in Canada (or elsewhere) who
do not disclose their local checking account -- now labeled by the IRS
as "an illegal offshore account" -- are liable for fines that stretch
back 10 years and might amount to $100,000. A family, like the Knolls,
in which there are two American parents and two dual-citizen children,
might be collectively liable for $400,000.
Approximately 7 million Americans live abroad. According to the IRS,
they received upward of 400,000 tax returns from expatriates last year
-- a compliance rate of approximately 6%. Presumably, the compliance of
dual-citizen children is far lower. Customs and Immigration is now
sharing information with the IRS and, should any of 94% expats or their
accidentally American offspring set foot on U.S. soil, they are
vulnerable to arrest.
Why Now?
Why Now?
As of 8:30 a.m. EST, Sept. 20, the US National debt was
$14,744,278,404,668. That is over $47,000 per American citizen, over
$131,000 per taxpayer. America is bankrupt and desperate to grab at any
loose dollar within its reach. Having reaped the easy pickings within
its own borders, America is extending its reach.
So far, the IRS push into foreign territory has been a rousing
success by their own standards. In 2009, the IRS offered "amnesty" --
that is, lessened but still hefty penalties -- to whoever stepped
forward to disclose foreign bank accounts. According to Fox Business
News, the 2009 program netted
"the government $2.2 billion in tax revenues…and $500 million in interest from the 2011 program, for a total of $2.7 billion…Moreover, the IRS says it has yet to reap penalties from these evaders, which could rake in hundreds of millions more."
IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman stated:
"we are in the middle of an unprecedented period for our global international tax enforcement efforts. We have pierced international bank secrecy laws, and we are making a serious dent in offshore tax evasion."
Going after the college money earned by children born and raised in
Canada (or elsewhere) is just one part of the international enforcement
effort. The entire package is called the Foreign Account Tax Compliance
Act, or FATCA; it was a revenue-raising provision that was slipped into
one of Obama's disastrous stimulus bills. Starting in 2013 -- or 2014 if
an exemption is granted -- every bank in the world will be required to
report to the IRS all accounts held by current and former U.S. citizens.
If account holders refuse to provide verification of their non-U.S.
citizenship, the banks will be required to impose a 30% tax of all
payments or transfers to the account on behalf of the IRS. Banks that do
not comply will "face withholding on U.S.-source interest and
dividends, gross proceeds from the disposition of U.S. securities and
pass-through payments."
Australia and Japan have already declared their refusal to comply.
Canada's Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has publicly stated that the
proposed American legislation "has far-reaching extraterritorial
implications. It would turn Canadian banks into extensions of the IRS
and would raise significant privacy concerns for Canadians."
According to the Financial Post:
"Toronto-Dominion Bank is putting up a fight against a new U.S. regulation that would compel foreign banks to sort through billions of dollars of deposits to find U.S. citizens who might be hiding money.… TD has complained that the proposed IRS rule is unreasonable because it would require the bank to make US $100-million investment in new software and staff. Other lenders resisting the effort include Allianz SE of Germany, Aegon NV of the Netherlands and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.… Now the Canadian Bankers association has joined the fray. In an emailed statement the CBA called the requirement 'highly complex' and 'very difficult and costly for Canadian banks to comply with.'"
The Financial Times reports,
"One of Asia's largest financial groups is quietly mulling a potentially explosive question: Could it organize some of its subsidiaries so that they could stop handling all U.S. Treasury bonds? Their motive has nothing to do with the outlook for the dollar.… Instead, what is worrying this particular Asian financial group is tax. In January 2013, the U.S. will implement a new law called the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act…The new rules leave some financial officials fuming in places such as Australia, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong and Singapore…Implementing these measures is likely to be costly; in jurisdictions such as Singapore or Hong Kong, the IRS rules appear to contravene local privacy laws…Hence the fact that some non-U.S. asset managers and banking groups are debating whether they could simply ignore FATCA by creating subsidiaries that never touch U.S. assets at all. 'This is complete madness for the U.S. -- America needs global investors to buy its bonds, ' fumes one bank manager. 'But not holding U.S. assets might turn out to be the easiest thing for us to do.'"
Meanwhile, banking will become more difficult within the United
States. FATCA will hold banks liable for any "improper" transfer of
money to outside the United States. The Wealth Report, a financial
analysis site, states,
"U.S. banks will be desperately trying to cover their liability by checking the exact purpose of the payment, to make sure it doesn't come within the scope of the legislation. The burden of proof will naturally pass to the account holder who is trying to transfer money, to demonstrate that the transaction is not subject to the new withholding tax. If the sending bank in the USA has any doubt at all about the purpose of the transaction, they will be forced to deduct 30% tax. Net result? It is going to be darned difficult for anyone to transfer money out of the USA. If that isn't a form of currency control, then I don't know what is! (emphasis original)"
Returning to the Little Guy and Gal
Expat Americans and children -- aka dual citizens -- will be caught
in the indiscriminate steel net that the IRS wants to throw around the
globe. Their innocence or ignorance will not matter. The IRS wants
money. If expats and duals do not owe money from their earnings, then
the IRS will pursue obscure reporting requirements and apply them to
people who did not even know they were American. It will try to yank
their college funds and drain their parents' retirement savings.
They can renounce their American citizenship, but that is an
imperfect solution. For one thing, it does not immunize them from the
past 10 years of nonreporting. For another, following the United States'
"exit" sign takes many people directly through the Treasury Department,
where they may be required to pay a brutal one-time exit tax.
Basically, for those with more than $2 million dollars in assets, the
tax comes to $600,000.
Moreover, renunciation is a difficult process. The Globe and Mail is one of many Canadian newspapers now explaining to readers how they can renounce American citizenship. G&M states,
"Renouncing your U.S. citizenship starts with a hefty fee -- $450 (U.S.), just for the chance to appear in front of a consular official. Need it done in a hurry? Forget about it. It can take about two years to get an appointment."
The true hope lies in a worldwide refusal to comply. The only power
strong enough to rein in the United States is the world itself. There is
hope that this will happen.Reuters declared,
"A U.S. law meant to snuff out billions of dollars in offshore tax evasion has drawn the criticism of the world's banks and business people, who dismiss it as imperialist and 'the neutron bomb of the global financial system'…A senior American finance executive at the Hong Kong branch of a major investment house [declared] that FATCA was 'America's most imperialist act since it invaded the Philippine Islands in 1899.' The regulation…was 'engendering a profound and growing anti-American sentiment abroad.'"
How long can America maintain that people "hate us for our freedom"?
People fear and hate America for its totalitarianism. And among those
people filled with fear are American citizens.
Regards,
Wendy McElroy
Wendy McElroy is the editor of "Freedom,
Feminism, and the State" (CATO 1982, Holmes & Meier 1992), "XXX: A
Woman's Right to Pornography" (St. Martin's, 1995), "Sexual Correctness:
The Gender Feminist Attack on Women" (McFarland, 1996), "The Reasonable
Woman: A Guide to Intellectual Survival" (Prometheus, 1998) and "Queen Silver: The Godless Girl" (Prometheus, Dec. 1999). She is a contributing editor to several other periodicals -- most notably FOX News Channel, but also including The Freeman, Liberty, OpinioNet and Free Inquiry -- and has published in such diverse magazines as National Review, Penthouse and Marie Claire. She lives with her husband in Canada.
No comments:
Post a Comment