Waiting for a US dollar rally this year has felt like Waiting for Godot
at times as we anticipated one for a long time before the greenback
finally rallied sharply in late August and early September after a long
period of stagnation over the summer, despite a number of market
developments that have normally proven positive for the currency in the
past. Those included falling equity markets, rising signs of worry in
other risk indicators and in global growth concerns, particularly in
Asia and emerging markets.
In our Q3 FX outlook, we discussed the “ugly horse-race” among the G-10 currencies because we felt that few if any of the major or minor developed economies would offer compelling reasons to buy their currencies and that it would be a question of which currencies appeared the least hobbled by fundamentals. The basic outlines of such a development have come to pass, though the USD was very slow to begin rallying as economic data out of the U.S. was terrible as well. But, the relative slowing in other economies and thus a tightening in interest rate spreads was indeed a positive driver for the eventual USD rally. And because U.S. rates were already so low, the tightening has even occurred despite Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s promise to keep the monetary pedal to the metal on low rates until at least mid 2013 – and despite hints that QE3 in some shape or form is on the way. To take the most pronounced example of falling yield spreads, the highest yielding currency among the G-10, the Australian dollar (overnight rate at 4.75 percent as of mid-September) saw its 2-year government bond yields drop from 4.75 percent at the beginning of Q3 to about 3.50 percent by mid-September, a 125-bp drop as compared with a drop in US 2-year rates of a mere 25 bps or so in the same time frame.
We suspect a further tightening in yield spreads between the USD and other currencies will continue to unwind the carry advantage built up against the USD last year and at the beginning of 2011 as economies around the world, particularly in Europe and to some degree in Asia and in developing markets, stumble through a soft patch in growth or worse. At the same time, yet another round of government stimulus and Fed QE could see a few quarters of solid GDP performance as US politicians pull out all the stops to get the economy going and then jostle to take credit for it ahead of the presidential election next November. Efforts in this direction will be aided by the long period of dollar weakness, which has made the U.S. extremely competitive for sourcing production and services and attractive for investment.
In our Q3 FX outlook, we discussed the “ugly horse-race” among the G-10 currencies because we felt that few if any of the major or minor developed economies would offer compelling reasons to buy their currencies and that it would be a question of which currencies appeared the least hobbled by fundamentals. The basic outlines of such a development have come to pass, though the USD was very slow to begin rallying as economic data out of the U.S. was terrible as well. But, the relative slowing in other economies and thus a tightening in interest rate spreads was indeed a positive driver for the eventual USD rally. And because U.S. rates were already so low, the tightening has even occurred despite Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s promise to keep the monetary pedal to the metal on low rates until at least mid 2013 – and despite hints that QE3 in some shape or form is on the way. To take the most pronounced example of falling yield spreads, the highest yielding currency among the G-10, the Australian dollar (overnight rate at 4.75 percent as of mid-September) saw its 2-year government bond yields drop from 4.75 percent at the beginning of Q3 to about 3.50 percent by mid-September, a 125-bp drop as compared with a drop in US 2-year rates of a mere 25 bps or so in the same time frame.
We suspect a further tightening in yield spreads between the USD and other currencies will continue to unwind the carry advantage built up against the USD last year and at the beginning of 2011 as economies around the world, particularly in Europe and to some degree in Asia and in developing markets, stumble through a soft patch in growth or worse. At the same time, yet another round of government stimulus and Fed QE could see a few quarters of solid GDP performance as US politicians pull out all the stops to get the economy going and then jostle to take credit for it ahead of the presidential election next November. Efforts in this direction will be aided by the long period of dollar weakness, which has made the U.S. extremely competitive for sourcing production and services and attractive for investment.
Chart: US 2-year yields vs. average G-10 currency yield. In the
chart above we have plotted the spread of the 2-year swap rates for the
USD vs. an average of the 2-year swap rates for the remainder of the G10
currencies. We’ve then compared this with the USD’s performance vs. an
evenly weighted basket of the remainder of the G10 currencies. It is
clear that from a yield perspective, owning the USD is far less
unattractive than it was just a few months ago. It is also clear from
the chart above that the USD has been slow to respond to this
development.
There are two further potential sources of USD strength – one is the likely return of the Homeland Investment Act (HIA), the original version of which allowed U.S. companies to repatriate profits tax free back in 2005. Q4 would appear to be the most likely timeframe to discuss and enact an HIA2, which would then go into effect in the New Year. Estimates of the amounts that might be repatriated this time around are far higher than the original HIA and could reach far over half a trillion dollars.
The other potential source of strength for the USD is that there is simply no alternative in a deleveraging world going where participants are unwinding their previous bets on “everything up versus the USD”. The lack of credibility of the Euro as the single currency faces an existential crisis now and in the coming few quarters will also continue to delay the demise of the USD’s status as the world’s reserve currency. Of course, these developments will not boost the U.S. currency forever and we wonder how long it will be until the long run accumulation of the twin U.S. deficits eventually returns to haunt the U.S. debt market and its currency.
Europe - crunch time
As we discuss in our introductory article to this publication, it is crunch time for the European Union, as the efforts of the European Central Bank and EU politicians have failed to outrun the galloping problems caused by the awkward framework of a single currency and 17 finance ministries and 17 sovereign bond markets. As we are leaving Q3, the situation is fast reaching the ultimate crossroads: either the EU makes a strong show of solidarity or a solution will quickly be forced upon it by the markets.
The Euro could see a relief rally if the EU manages to muddle through with the solidarity enforced by the market’s discipline, but a longer term solution to European debt woes would likely involve some form of QE by the ECB to keep bond markets orderly and dig European banks out of their liquidity pinch. And if the USD has been so punished for the Fed’s various rounds of QE, why shouldn’t a similarly dim view be taken of the Euro for also engaging in money printing? Of course, the immediate relief that sovereign debt investments won’t go immediately bad could offset some of the deleterious effects of a European version of QE (save for Greece, where a severe haircut or Greek exit is a question of time). And a more stable sovereign debt and financial services environment could see the Euro rewarded for its deep liquidity versus higher beta, more pro-cyclical currencies as global growth possibly hits a soft patch over the next couple of quarters.
The Scandies - safe havens?
There was a flurry of talk about the potential for NOK and SEK to become safe haven currencies in the wake of the Swiss National Bank’s frantic and so far successful efforts to put a floor in EURCHF at 1.20. Immediately in the wake of the SNB’s announcement in early September, the market drove both NOK and SEK sharply stronger, completely out of proportion to any other development that could have explained the situation besides the idea of safe haven seeking (or reversals based on positioning?). Afterwards, however, the strengthening in these currencies was erased. So are they potential safe havens or not? There are two important features a currency must have in order to be considered a safe haven in today’s environment – a superior sovereign balance sheet and deep liquidity. CHF used to be the best option until the franc’s incredible strength made the SNB and Swiss government “go nuclear” in their intervention. Sweden has a very solid balance sheet and Norway has an impeccable one, but both SEK and NOK fail the liquidity requirement for a true safe haven. Also, SEK is traditionally a pro-cyclical currency due to its economy’s dependence on export markets. NOK is similarly dependent on oil exports, though it tries to sterilise oil revenues with its pension fund. Of the two, NOK would appear a safer harbour than many of the rest of the G-10 currencies, but it would be surprising to see performance similar to the Swiss franc’s (where the oversized Swiss financial industry was an additional contributor to the franc’s aggravated rise).
The Antipodeans: still waiting for the fall
Last time around we asked whether the strength in the Aussie and Kiwi versus the rest of the market was a bit overdone. Both currencies have begun to trade a bit more sideways in Q3, including one particularly sharp sell-off as equities slid off a cliff in early August. The kiwi has been the stronger of the two due to a few months of perkier economic data and the belief that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand might unwind the emergency rate cut taken in the wake of the earthquake earlier this year. But both rather extremely overvalued – particularly the Aussie, given present market circumstances and our expected scenario for Q4. Because Australia has the highest policy rate among the G10 currencies, it also will likely have the highest beta to risk as the Reserve Bank of Australia has more potential for policy accommodation. The housing bubble appears to be in near full deflation phase now Down Under and could cause a considerable pinch in the Australian banking sector, suggesting that eventually even the RBA has to get in on the Maximum Intervention game in the quarters to come.
There are two further potential sources of USD strength – one is the likely return of the Homeland Investment Act (HIA), the original version of which allowed U.S. companies to repatriate profits tax free back in 2005. Q4 would appear to be the most likely timeframe to discuss and enact an HIA2, which would then go into effect in the New Year. Estimates of the amounts that might be repatriated this time around are far higher than the original HIA and could reach far over half a trillion dollars.
The other potential source of strength for the USD is that there is simply no alternative in a deleveraging world going where participants are unwinding their previous bets on “everything up versus the USD”. The lack of credibility of the Euro as the single currency faces an existential crisis now and in the coming few quarters will also continue to delay the demise of the USD’s status as the world’s reserve currency. Of course, these developments will not boost the U.S. currency forever and we wonder how long it will be until the long run accumulation of the twin U.S. deficits eventually returns to haunt the U.S. debt market and its currency.
Europe - crunch time
As we discuss in our introductory article to this publication, it is crunch time for the European Union, as the efforts of the European Central Bank and EU politicians have failed to outrun the galloping problems caused by the awkward framework of a single currency and 17 finance ministries and 17 sovereign bond markets. As we are leaving Q3, the situation is fast reaching the ultimate crossroads: either the EU makes a strong show of solidarity or a solution will quickly be forced upon it by the markets.
The Euro could see a relief rally if the EU manages to muddle through with the solidarity enforced by the market’s discipline, but a longer term solution to European debt woes would likely involve some form of QE by the ECB to keep bond markets orderly and dig European banks out of their liquidity pinch. And if the USD has been so punished for the Fed’s various rounds of QE, why shouldn’t a similarly dim view be taken of the Euro for also engaging in money printing? Of course, the immediate relief that sovereign debt investments won’t go immediately bad could offset some of the deleterious effects of a European version of QE (save for Greece, where a severe haircut or Greek exit is a question of time). And a more stable sovereign debt and financial services environment could see the Euro rewarded for its deep liquidity versus higher beta, more pro-cyclical currencies as global growth possibly hits a soft patch over the next couple of quarters.
The Scandies - safe havens?
There was a flurry of talk about the potential for NOK and SEK to become safe haven currencies in the wake of the Swiss National Bank’s frantic and so far successful efforts to put a floor in EURCHF at 1.20. Immediately in the wake of the SNB’s announcement in early September, the market drove both NOK and SEK sharply stronger, completely out of proportion to any other development that could have explained the situation besides the idea of safe haven seeking (or reversals based on positioning?). Afterwards, however, the strengthening in these currencies was erased. So are they potential safe havens or not? There are two important features a currency must have in order to be considered a safe haven in today’s environment – a superior sovereign balance sheet and deep liquidity. CHF used to be the best option until the franc’s incredible strength made the SNB and Swiss government “go nuclear” in their intervention. Sweden has a very solid balance sheet and Norway has an impeccable one, but both SEK and NOK fail the liquidity requirement for a true safe haven. Also, SEK is traditionally a pro-cyclical currency due to its economy’s dependence on export markets. NOK is similarly dependent on oil exports, though it tries to sterilise oil revenues with its pension fund. Of the two, NOK would appear a safer harbour than many of the rest of the G-10 currencies, but it would be surprising to see performance similar to the Swiss franc’s (where the oversized Swiss financial industry was an additional contributor to the franc’s aggravated rise).
The Antipodeans: still waiting for the fall
Last time around we asked whether the strength in the Aussie and Kiwi versus the rest of the market was a bit overdone. Both currencies have begun to trade a bit more sideways in Q3, including one particularly sharp sell-off as equities slid off a cliff in early August. The kiwi has been the stronger of the two due to a few months of perkier economic data and the belief that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand might unwind the emergency rate cut taken in the wake of the earthquake earlier this year. But both rather extremely overvalued – particularly the Aussie, given present market circumstances and our expected scenario for Q4. Because Australia has the highest policy rate among the G10 currencies, it also will likely have the highest beta to risk as the Reserve Bank of Australia has more potential for policy accommodation. The housing bubble appears to be in near full deflation phase now Down Under and could cause a considerable pinch in the Australian banking sector, suggesting that eventually even the RBA has to get in on the Maximum Intervention game in the quarters to come.
G-10: the bottom lines
USD: A lack of alternatives and Maximum Intervention gone global will make the USD continue to look less unattractive in Q4 and the currency has been so weak for so long that the U.S. economy could reap some of the benefit.
EUR: It is crunch time for the Eurozone, which will need to pull together or face a further – and this time more urgent – existential challenge. Will Germany step up to foot the bill for the periphery?
JPY: The government bond rally and declining interest rate spreads (the carry in the carry trade) are the only real supports, as the domestic Japanese economy is relatively moribund. If bond markets pivot some day, so will the JPY, until then, it could remain strong for a while yet.
GBP: Sterling shows us the degree to which the Euro’s woes are driven by its untenable political and central bank framework rather than by the absolute magnitude of its sovereign debt as the UK debt load and deficits are far worse. Yet, GBP has already been endlessly punished, and similar to the USD, could rally “by default” due to dimmer prospects elsewhere relative to previous expectations.
CHF: The Swiss franc has become the latest, most impressive victim of maximum intervention, which makes the world believe that no fiat currency can be a true safe haven forever. We assume that the determination of the SNB and Swiss Government will keep the CHF weaker.
AUD: Aussie did sell-off when risk appetite swooned in early August, but it is far too resilient given risk averse circumstances, prospects for slower growth in Asia, and on the risk of a disorderly unwinding of the domestic housing market. A heady adjustment lower could finally arrive in Q4 for the Aussie.
CAD: It will continue to trade as an “in-betweener” – a lower beta risk currency that may find resilience in its exposure to a less weak than feared U.S. economy. Still, the currency has only so much upside despite the solidity of the sovereign balance sheet and banks, as Canada features the world’s most overleveraged consumer.
NZD: Some of its strength has derived from economic activity from earthquake rebuilding and some of it from Chinese diversification interest (which throws huge weight around in the less liquid kiwi). The rally could falter in Q4 on weaker than expected Asian growth prospects and as the RBNZ stays pat.
SEK: Likely to remain a pro-cyclical currency – the country could face a slowdown that could be multiplied by a European demand slowdown. In addition, Sweden’s housing market is a raging bubble, though the signs of strain have yet to show much. Could they begin to do so in Q4?
NOK: Rate expectations have tumbled as with most other currencies where there is enough rate to cut. NOK may find a safe harbour bid to a degree due to the country’s unmatched sovereign balance sheet, so strength versus the most pro-cyclical currencies might come into play in Q4 and Q1.
